Having these analogies being shown to the public and used in ways that do not benefit or help the analogy is exactly the reason why using the Hitler analogy is unethical and should not be used. People nowadays use these analogies too loosely and so much so that the concept of the analogy is belittled from the true history behind it. They also prevent people from engaging with the actual issues at hand – ones that urgently require our attention: immigration reform, rampant xenophobia, social and economic restructuring in a globalized world, and a loss of faith in government’s ability to solve pressing problems.” So not only is it unethical to use the analogy but it does not even spark the right conversation and drives away from the important conversations people should be having. Trump in his time so far has not done anything like what Hitler did in the 1930’s so why compare him to Hitler? According to Taschka, having “False equivalencies not only risk trivializing Hitler and the horrors he unleashed. Throughout Donald Trump’s time in the office, many people have used his words and compare them to Hitler.

By having people use the analogies to signify a person’s actions or how bad an event was it diminishes Hitler and the history just a little bit. Online and in the media people have used Hitler or Nazi analogies to emphasize an idea, event or even to refer to people. The concept of what happened historically is slowly diminishing its historical value when someone decides to use Hitler or the Nazi as an analogy for something that does not even relate or compare to the millions dead or the horrible things the Nazi did to children and innocent people.

Or as bad as what the expansion of the United States westward did to Native Americans.” The minute that someone compares something to Hitler or the Nazi it takes away the historical factor of the analogy by trying to exaggerate the conversation. In Godwin’s article, he discusses that “even if it is terrible to separate children from their parents (and sometimes lose track of them, or make it impossible for their parents contact them, or even deprive them of the comfort of human touch), it’s not as awful as what the Nazis did. Using Hitler or the Nazi as a way to compare someone or an event can potentially do some harm. Instead of having a conversation about why it is wrong to use that analogy or why people should talk about what Hitler did in the past, but it will direct the conversation in a different path. Making these analogies is unethical because it is slowly being used to compare different things when the history is far more horrifying. To many, this analogy is unethical and might take away from the history itself but to others, it is used as a way to give a visualization to what might happen. Hitler, to many people, may be seen as a person who has done so many horrible things to many people in the past yet in the present some people choose to compare him or the Nazi to events or people.

Compare anything website